You can avoid two calls to the bookmaker and lock in today’s line on a later game by telling your bookmaker you intend to make an “if” bet. “If” bets can be made on two games kicking off at the same time. The bookmaker will wait until the first game is over. If the first game wins, he will put the same amount on the next game even though it has already been played.
Although an “if” bet is actually two straight bets at normal vig, you can’t decide later that so long as want the next bet. When you make an “if” bet, the next bet can not be cancelled, even though the next game has not gone off yet. If the first game wins, you can have action on the next game. For that reason, there is less control over an “if” bet than over two straight bets. When the 2 games you bet overlap with time, however, the only method to bet one as long as another wins is by placing an “if” bet. Needless to say, when two games overlap with time, cancellation of the next game bet is no issue. It should be noted, that whenever the 2 games start at differing times, most books will not permit you to fill out the next game later. You must designate both teams whenever you make the bet.
You possibly can make an “if” bet by saying to the bookmaker, “I want to make an ‘if’ bet,” and then, “Give me Team A IF Team B for $100.” Giving your bookmaker that instruction is the identical to betting $110 to win $100 on Team A, and then, as long as Team A wins, betting another $110 to win $100 on Team B.
If the first team in the “if” bet loses, there is no bet on the next team. Regardless of whether the next team wins of loses, your total loss on the “if” bet will be $110 whenever you lose on the first team. If the first team wins, however, you’d have a bet of $110 to win $100 going on the next team. In that case, if the next team loses, your total loss will be just the $10 of vig on the split of the 2 teams. If both games win, you’d win $100 on Team A and $100 on Team B, for a total win of $200. Thus, the most loss on an “if” will be $110, and the most win will be $200. This really is balanced by the disadvantage of losing the entire $110, instead of just $10 of vig, everytime the teams split with the first team in the bet losing.
Bettors soon found that how you can steer clear of the uncertainty brought on by the order of wins and loses is to produce two “if” bets putting each team first. Instead of betting $110 on ” Team A if Team B,” you’d bet just $55 on ” Team A if Team B.” and then make a second “if” bet reversing the order of the teams for another $55. The 2nd bet would put Team B first and Team A second. This kind of double bet, reversing the order of the same two teams, is named an “if/reverse” or sometimes only a “reverse.”
If both teams win, the end result is the same as you played just one “if” bet for $100. You win $50 on Team A in the first “if bet, and then $50 on Team B, for a total win of $100. In the next “if” bet, you win $50 on Team B, and then $50 on Team A, for a total win of $100. Both “if” bets together result in a total win of $200 when both teams win.
If both teams lose, the end result would also be just like in the event that you played just one “if” bet for $100. Team A’s loss would run you $55 in the first “if” combination, and nothing would go onto Team B. In the next combination, Team B’s loss would run you $55 and nothing would go onto to Team A. You would lose $55 on all the bets for a total maximum loss of $110 whenever both teams lose.
The difference occurs once the teams split. Instead of losing $110 when the first team loses and the next wins, and $10 when the first team wins but the next loses, in the reverse you’ll lose $60 on a divided no matter what team wins and which loses. It works out this way. If Team A loses you’ll lose $55 on the first combination, and have nothing going on the winning Team B. In the next combination, you’ll win $50 on Team B, and have action on Team A for a $55 loss, resulting in a net loss on the next mix of $5 vig. The increased loss of $55 on the first “if” bet and $5 on the next “if” bet provides you with a combined loss of $60 on the “reverse.” When Team B loses, you’ll lose the $5 vig on the first combination and the $55 on the next combination for the same $60 on the split..
We have accomplished this smaller loss of $60 instead of $110 when the first team loses without any decrease in the win when both teams win. In the single $110 “if” bet and the 2 reversed “if” bets for $55, the win is $200 when both teams cover the spread. The bookmakers would never put themselves at that sort of disadvantage, however. The gain of $50 whenever Team A loses is fully offset by the extra $50 loss ($60 instead of $10) whenever Team B may be the loser. Thus, the “reverse” doesn’t actually save us anything, but it comes with the main advantage of making the risk more predictable, and avoiding the worry regarding which team to put first in the “if” bet.
DON’T, when you can win a lot more than 52.5% or maybe more of your games. If you fail to consistently achieve a successful percentage, however, making “if” bets whenever you bet two teams could save you money.
For the winning bettor, the “if” bet adds an element of luck to your betting equation that doesn’t belong there. If two games are worth betting, then they ought to both be bet. Betting on you ought to not be produced determined by whether or not you win another. On one other hand, for the bettor who includes a negative expectation, the “if” bet will prevent him from betting on the next team whenever the first team loses. By preventing some bets, the “if” bet saves the negative expectation bettor some vig.
The $10 savings for the “if” bettor results from the fact that he is not betting the next game when both lose. Set alongside the straight bettor, the “if” bettor comes with an additional cost of $100 when Team A loses and Team B wins, but he saves $110 when Team A and Team B both lose.
The rule for the winning bettor is precisely opposite. Whatever keeps the winning bettor from betting more games is bad, and therefore “if” bets will definitely cost the winning handicapper money. Once the winning bettor plays fewer games, he’s fewer winners. Understand that the next time someone informs you that how you can win would be to bet fewer games. A good winner never wants to bet fewer games. Since “if/reverses” work-out the exact same as “if” bets, they both place the winner at the same disadvantage.
Exceptions to the Rule – When a Winner Should Bet Parlays and “IF’s”
Much like all rules, you will find exceptions. “If” bets and parlays should be created by successful with an optimistic expectation in only two circumstances::
If you find no other choice and he must bet either an “if/reverse,” a parlay, or an intro; or
When betting co-dependent propositions.
The only time แทงมวยสเต็ป I could think of that you have no other choice is if you should be the most effective man at your friend’s wedding, you are waiting to walk down the aisle, your laptop looked ridiculous in the pocket of your tux which means you left it in the car, you only bet offshore in a deposit account without any credit line, the book includes a $50 minimum phone bet, you want two games which overlap with time, you pull out your trusty cell 5 minutes before kickoff and 45 seconds before you must walk to the alter with some beastly bride’s maid in a frilly purple dress on your own arm, you try to produce two $55 bets and suddenly realize you only have $75 in your account.
Because the old philosopher used to express, “Is that what’s troubling you, bucky?” If so, hold your head up high, put a smile on that person, try to find the silver lining, and make a $50 “if” bet on your own two teams. Needless to say you may bet a parlay, but as you will see below, the “if/reverse” is a good replacement for the parlay if you should be winner.
For the winner, the most effective method is straight betting. In the event of co-dependent bets, however, as already discussed, there is an enormous advantage to betting combinations. With a parlay, the bettor is getting the benefit of increased parlay odds of 13-5 on combined bets which have greater compared to normal expectation of winning. Since, by definition, co-dependent bets must often be contained within the same game, they must be produced as “if” bets. With a co-dependent bet our advantage comes from the fact that we make the next bet only IF among the propositions wins.
It’d do us no good to straight bet $110 each on the favorite and the underdog and $110 each on the over and the under. We would simply lose the vig irrespective of how often the favorite and over or the underdog and under combinations won. As we’ve seen, when we play two out of 4 possible results in two parlays of the favorite and over and the underdog and under, we are able to net a $160 win when among our combinations comes in. When to choose the parlay or the “reverse” when coming up with co-dependent combinations is discussed below.
Choosing Between “IF” Bets and Parlays
Centered on a $110 parlay, which we’ll use for the purpose of consistent comparisons, our net parlay win when among our combinations hits is $176 (the $286 win on the winning parlay without the $110 loss on the losing parlay). In a $110 “reverse” bet our net win will be $180 everytime among our combinations hits (the $400 win on the winning if/reverse without the $220 loss on the losing if/reverse).